authorityresearch.com

The Solution To Marxism, I.E., The Karl Marx In Your Heart,
I.E., Your Lusting After The Carnal Pleasures Of The 'Moment,' Which Includes The Praises Of Men.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

What is Marxism?

Karl Marx based his 'reasoning' off of that of Heraclitus, believing that adults should get out of the way, i.e., drown themselves and let the youth rule, i.e., that adults with their established commands, rules, facts, and truth are the oppressors, oppressing the youth, preventing them from becoming their "self," inhibiting or blocking them from making decisions from their own "feelings," i.e., from their own sense experience—making the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, i.e., that which is only of the world the only means to knowing the 'truth.'

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Marxist ideology did not come from the stars. Marxism comes from your heart. It would not "work," i.e., gain a foothold unless it was something you by nature do, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and hate restraint. That is why it so easily gains a foothold amongst the youth—'justifying' their "self," i.e., their love of pleasure, i.e., their "lusts" before one another, doing what they want to do, refusing to be told.

"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Genesis 2:17

"And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:" Genesis 3:4, 5

"If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man [where the father's/Father's authority rules] can ever be redeemed by freedom [where the child's/man's carnal nature rules], then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" (Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud)

A Marxist, in order to remain a Marxist can not afford to hear and receive the truth, i.e., develop a guilty conscience for his carnal thoughts and actions, admit he is wrong, repent, endure the rejection and wrath of his piers, follow the Lord, and do the Father's will, i.e., hear and receive the solution. This is why the truth, i.e., "thou shalt surely die," i.e., being told must be negated, i.e., must be replaced with a lie, i.e., "Ye shall not surely die" in order (as in "new" world order) for the Marxist to decide for his "self" what is right and what is wrong behavior—"lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without any fear of judgment, i.e., without any sense of accountability for his carnal thoughts and actions.

"Every one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12

"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." Ephesians 2:2,3

"Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them." Ephesians 5:5-7

"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Ecclesiastes 11:9

"It is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

Whoever defines terms for you controls your life. Marxism is so much a part of you you can not see it without being told. If you refuse to be told then "the prince of the power of the air" is still in control (defining terms for you) telling you a lie, i.e., "Ye shall not surely die," i.e., you are in control—"Enjoy the 'moment.'"

Marxism is your natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating as well as your natural inclination to hate restraint being "actualized," i.e., being put into praxis—negating the father's/Father's authority (Hebrews 12:5-11) in your thoughts in order (as in "new" world order) for you to do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (Romans 7:14-25)—which the father's/Father's authority engenders—requiring others, i.e., "the group," i.e., "the people" to 'justify,' i.e., to affirm the Karl Marx in your heart, so you (and they) can "lust" with impunity. The moment a Marxist realizes he is wrong, contrition sets in. He must either repent, i.e., reject Marxism, i.e., "Flee also youthful lusts:" or 'justify' his "self," i.e., remain a Marxist, silencing anyone who engenders contrition. 2 Timothy 2:22

"Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

Marxism is you 'justifying' your "self" before others, i.e., before "the group," i.e., before "the people," establishing "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority—negating the father's/Father's authority in your thoughts and actions—resulting in "self" and the world becoming one, i.e., in you becoming "self actualized."

"Self-actualizing people ... are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches Of Human Nature)

"Rule of law," i.e., the father's/Father's authority, which engenders the guilty conscience in you for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating gets in the way of "self actualization."

"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7

"For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do." "I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God ..." "... But I see another law ..." "... bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." Excerpts from Romans 7:14-25

'Justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' not only 'justifies' the removal (negation) of the father's/Father's authority but also the removal (negation) of anyone else who gets in the way, which includes the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous. The Marxist requires everyone in "the group," i.e., in society, i.e., "the people" to approve, i.e., affirm (to be "tolerant" of) each others "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' so he can "lust" with impunity. Karl Marx, in essence made his first appearance in a garden in Eden, "helping" two "children" 'liberate' their "self," i.e., the Karl Marx in their heart from "the Father's authority," continuing to do the same today, facilitating 'change' (Genesis 3:1-6).

"This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;" 2 Timothy 3:1-4

"From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts." James 4:1-3

The Marxist sees his "self," i.e., his "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life" as the personification of "the people." Anyone who inhibits or blocks, i.e., prevents "the people" from becoming their "self" is inhibiting or blocking, i.e., preventing him from becoming his "self," thus 'justifying' his, i.e., "the peoples" violence against them, i.e., their negation. Negation is violence without a conscience, 'justified' in the name of "the people." He sees his "self" as an innocent bystander (not accountable) as he watches violence carried out in the name of "the people," not doing anything to stop it, getting in the way of those who try to, condemning those who do.

Marxism is based upon "human nature," i.e., your natural inclination to "lust" after pleasure and hate restraint. The Marxist must therefore question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack, i.e., negate the father's/Father's authority, i.e., negate that which forces him to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) his "self" in order (as in "old" world order) for him to do what he is told, i.e., negate that which requires him to accept established facts and truth as is, i.e., by faith and obey established commands and rules as given, which engenders a guilty conscience in him when he does wrong, disobeys, sins, i.e., when he "lusts." According to the Marxist, since everyone, young and old, of all races, etc., by nature "lust," those preaching, teaching, and discussing established commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as is, by faith and obeyed, i.e., those initiating and sustaining the father's/Father's authority system must be negated in order (as in "new" world order) for the Karl Marx in them, i.e., "lust" to become "actualized." Therefore anyone, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous who stands in the way of "lust," i.e., who inhibits or blocks "human nature," i.e., who prevents "self," i.e., "lust" from becoming "actualized" must be negated for the sake of "the people's," i.e., for the sake of everyone's (the Marxist's) peace of mind (no sense of guilt for his crime). For the Marxist, since his "self" and "the people" are one and the same (both "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' and hating restraint), how he "feels," "the people" "feel" and how "the people" "feel," he "feels"—"the people" can not become "actualized" without him (affirming them), and he can not become "actualized" without them (affirming him). Therefore anyone not affirming "lust," i.e., "the people," i.e., him must be negated.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

In other words, according to Karl Marx et al. "Lust reconciles you to the world." "Lust," "self," "self interest," the Karl Marx in you, i.e., in your heart and "the world," i.e., society, i.e., "the people" are one and the same. According to the Marxist, you are only your "self", i.e., "self actualized," i.e., a Marxist when you are "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with men's, i.e., "the group's," i.e., "the people's" and the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., Karl Marx's affirmation, removing (negating) anyone which gets in the way. The idea being, "Don't study Marx. Be Marx, Be your 'self.'"

"If it feels good, just do it." (Marcuse)

"Freud [and] Hegel are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force in order to explain repression. Under the conditions of repression the essence of being lies in the unconscious." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, ..." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious; the foundation has to be recovered." (Brown)

To the Marxist "sense experience," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" and the world that stimulates them is how you come to know the 'truth,' i.e., what is "actual." Not by being told. This is why college students, even homeschooled students in college become Marxists so quickly, disrespecting, i.e., questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking their parents authority (or any authority), i.e., being told when they get home from school. Out from under parental authority, with a facilitator of 'change' as their professor and their fellow students encouraging them to be their "self," i.e., to do what they want, when they want, i.e., "to enjoy the present," i.e., to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, "It's time to party!" "Class warfare," "cancel culture" etc., is simply those who are "partying," i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' having pleasure in "partying, i.e., getting rid of (negating) those who are in their way, so they can do what they want, when they want, i.e., "enjoy the present" without having a guilty conscience.

"I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell." (Luther's Works: Vol. 1, The Christian in Society: p. 207)

The "pride of life," i.e., "self-actualization" is you, i.e., the Karl Marx in you 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lust of the flesh," your "lust of the eyes," and your hate of restraint before others who have the same "lusts" and hate.

"I am nothing and I should be everything." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

Karl Marx "lusted" after the praises of men. By identifying his hatred toward authority in all people—hatred toward having to humble, deny, die to (capitulate) his "self " in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will, which prevents the "actualization" of "self," he elevated "self" above God, i.e., above the father's/Father's authority, making "self," i.e., "lust" for pleasure and hatred toward restraint God, i.e., the arbiter of right and wrong behavior and thought.

"And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." Genesis 3:6

Karl Marx advocated doing what the woman in the garden in Eden did, deciding right and wrong behavior according to her carnal desires, i.e., her "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., her "lust of the flesh" i.e., her "sensuous needs" of the 'moment' (the tree was "good for food") and her "lust of the eyes," i.e., her "sense perception" of the situation (it was "pleasing to the eyes") engendering "the pride of life," i.e., making her "sense experience," i.e., her carnal nature the basis from which to know right from wrong behavior ("desired to make her wise") instead of doing what she was told, in essence making "self," i.e., "sense experience," i.e., pleasure, i.e., "lust" God, i.e., a "self-actualized" God, not only "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, but also "lusting" after the praises of men (needing Adam's affirmation), 'liberating' "self," i.e., "lust" from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from the fear of judgment, condemnation, damnation (negating it from her mind, until God showed up, then as all 'liberals' do she tried to 'justify' her "self," i.e., her "lust," i.e., the Karl Marx in her heart by blaming someone else, i.e., "throwing someone else under the bus" for her sins—as Adam did to her and God).

"And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." "And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat." Genesis 3:13, 12

Living in the 'moment,' i.e., in the "eternal present," i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' blinds you to the consequences of your sins, i.e., 'liberates' you (in you mind) from any fear of judgment in the future, making all that is "actual," i.e., "real" subject to the here-and-now, i.e., subject to "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," with the top prize being "the pride of life," i.e., the affirmation of men, i.e., "self," i.e., "lust" being 'justified' by others, making the praises of men, i.e., "I am everything," i.e., God. For this to happen, i.e., for the child, i.e., the Karl Marx in you to become God, i.e., "to become everything," i.e., to become "actualized" the father's/Father's authority, which engenders the guilty conscience in you for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (which tells you "You are not God") must be negated. Marxism, i.e., "lust" for pleasure, i.e., "self" 'justification' is so intoxicating, addictive, possessive you can not see your hatred toward restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority as being "wicked," i.e., "desperately wicked" ("who can know it") until you humble, deny, die to (capitulate) your "self " before the father/Father in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will, resulting in you preaching, teaching, and discussing the truth with others, creating a guilty conscience in them for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' doing what Marxists can not allow you to do—for their sake.

"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22

The father's/Father's authority system is antithetical to Marxism, i.e., is what must be negated if man is to become his "self," i.e., "actualized." This is why, to the Marxist, the Son of God (obeying His Heavenly Father in all things commanded, demanding that all men to do the same), ,i.e., the gospel message is the greatest enemy of "the people," i.e., of the Marxist and must be removed from public display/presentation, i.e., support if Marxism, i.e., "lust" is to have complete control over "the people," controlling their thoughts and actions—so the Marxist can rule without opposition.

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

What the Marxist must do to those who adhere to the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., the antithesis once he identifies it in them.

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

According to Karl Marx, et al. once the traditional family, i.e., the "middle-class," with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth "is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family," with the Son, Jesus Christ, humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, "the former," i.e., the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father "must then itself be destroyed," i.e., negated "in theory and in practice" ("theoretically and practically"), i.e., in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions (doing what "seems to" be "reasonable," i.e., "rational," i.e., practical to them instead of doing that which gets in the way of their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating)—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon preaching, teaching, and discussing the father's/Father's (their parent's/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment.' In order (as in "new" world order) for children to become their "self," i.e., to "actualize" their "self" a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" must be 'created,' where the child's carnal nature can "rule" without parental restraint," i.e., where children can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust," i.e., can be their "self" without fear of judgment, condemnation, being rejected (without having a guilty conscience, i.e., being held accountable) for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions.

What is thesis to the Marxist?

Thesis is the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, hating restraint. Without it 'change' can not be initiated or sustained.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' without having a guilty conscience, i.e., a fear of judgment (accountability), i.e., the father's/Father's authority in his thoughts]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

What stimulates 'change,' i.e., Marxism, i.e., synthesis, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" and "the world" becoming one, and what inhibits or blocks it?

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb.

All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, i.e., missing out on pleasure, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once they become fathers, "doing what they want then they want."

"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires of the 'moment' and those "helping" them 'liberate' their "self" from the father's/Father's authority]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

Identifying the "problem"—righteousness, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will—in order to negate it. Identifying the solution—sensuousness, i.e., becoming your "self"—in order to "actualize" it.

Since earthly fathers have sensuousness, i.e., "chastened us after their own pleasure," by bringing them and the children (along with the mother) together in sensuousness, i.e., "lust," i.e., "What can I get out of this person for my 'self?'" ("the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes") and "What will happen to me if they reject me?" ("the pride of life"), i.e., what we all have in common (the basis of common-ism), the father's/Father's authority system can be negated.

"The unspeculative Christian also recognizes sensuality as long as it does not assert itself at the expense of true reason, i.e., of faith, of true love, i.e., of love of God, of true will-power, i.e., of will in Christ. Not for the sake of sensual love, not for the lust of the flesh, but because the Lord said: Increase and multiply." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

"Persons will not come into full partnership in the process until they register dissatisfaction [with authority]." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, rejected, and/or punished]. To gain access [through getting him or her to dialogue, i.e., to share his or her "feelings," i.e., desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his or her "self" and the world only—'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Adorno)

"While adult sexuality serves the socially useful purpose of breeding children, it is for the individual in some sense an end in itself as a source of pleasure – according to Freud, the highest pleasure." "Adult sexuality, restricted by rules, to maintain family and society, . . . leads to neurosis ["neurosis," i.e., doing the father's/Father's will in opposition to your carnal desires of the 'moment']." "Parental discipline, religious denunciation of bodily pleasure, . . . have all left man overly docile, but secretly in his unconscious unconvinced, and therefore neurotic." "The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination [the father's/Father's authority].""By the standards of normal adult sexuality [to "maintain family and society"] children are polymorphously perverse ['incestuous,' i.e., immoral]." "Normal adult sexuality [the traditional husband-wife relationship], judged by the standard of infantile sexuality [by the child's natural inclination to become at-one-with nature, in pleasure, in the 'moment'], is an unnatural restriction of the erotic potentialities of the human body." The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the child's carnal nature, i.e., in his desire for the pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction with restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority]; the foundation has to be recovered [through dialogue, i.e., by putting the child's carnal nature into practice, i.e., into social action (praxis)]." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." (Brown)

The "problem," according to Karl Marx, et, al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from becoming, i.e., "actualizing" their "self," i.e., preventing 'change'—restoring the father's/Father's authority, engendering the guilty conscience in the next generation of citizens for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment.' Without "help" from outside the family, i.e., without the facilitator of 'change' creating a world of dialogue where the child can be his "self," the child (out of fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out—privately dialoguing with his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint) will remain forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough to overcome the father/Father authority system in his "self," i.e., he can not negate the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" on his own.

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Brown)

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

"The peasantry [the traditional family] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., the middle-class]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920)

"The workers' council [the consensus process] spells the political and economic defeat of reification ["the bourgeoisie," i.e., the father's/Father's authority]. In the period following the dictatorship [the takeover of government by one person, supporting and defending "the workers' council," i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process] it will eliminate the bourgeois separation of the legislature, administration, and judiciary." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

Unlike socialism, i.e., centralized government, our government, i.e., limited, represented, constitutional government was not framed around despots, facilitator's of 'change,' "the group," or the consensus process but was founded upon individualism, under God, with the citizen, i.e., the constituent, i.e., the father being the King, sending his child, i.e., his representative to the store to buy his goods, i.e., to "re-present" him, doing his will. If his child, i.e., his "re-presentative" spent his (the father's) money on his and his "friends" "self interests," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" instead, he was not set back to the store again.

"Despotism" ...."that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart." "It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism." "If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield." (George Washington, Farewell Address)

How does the Marxist (Transformational Marxist) negate the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the antithesis? The Traditional Marxist just shot the father, leaving the guilty conscience, i.e., antithesis in tack in the children, i.e., in the next generation of citizens, who then looked for a dictator, i.e., a "father figure" to lead them.

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

By focusing upon synthesis, i.e., 1) "helping" the child 'discover' that his carnal nature of the past, i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates is the same carnal nature of the present, 2) "helping" him 'justify' his carnal nature, i.e., "lusts" of the present, 3) the antithesis of the past and the present, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system, and the guilty conscience ("the negative valence") it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is negated.

"We have to study the conditions which maximize ought-perceptiveness." "Oughtiness is itself a fact to be perceived." "If we wish to permit the facts to tell us their oughtiness, we must learn to listen to them in a very specific way which can be called Taoistic [let the child share all his "feelings," i.e., his "lusts" and resentments, i.e., "sense experiences" of the past and present without fear of judgment or condemnation]." (Maslow, Farther Reaches)

"Sense experience ["the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life"] must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience ["the pride of life"], in the two forms of sense perception ["the lust of the eyes"] and sensuous need ["the lust of the flesh"], that is, only when it proceeds from Nature ["from the world"]." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"Experience ["the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life"] is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Brown)

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) In a discussion the father's/Father's authority system is retained. In a discussion you must suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires, i.e., your "self," i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., you must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to hear and receive an established command, rule, fact, or truth, accepting it as is.

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) The father's/Father's authority system is negated in dialogue. In dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of, i.e., that inhibits or blocks dialogue, i.e., that prevents people from sharing their opinions, i.e., their "feelings," i.e., their "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating.

The simplest way to explain the difference between discussion and dialogue is the language you use to choose what you are going to eat when you go out to lunch. When you choose from the menu those things you 'like' or want to eat you are dialoguing with your "self" and with others. When you notice and comment on those items on the menu that you know are right, safe, or good for you to eat and those items that you know are wrong, unsafe, or bad for you to eat you are discussing with your "self" and with others. Discussion is formal, dealing with right and wrong behavior. Dialogue is informal, dealing with preferences, i.e., 'likes' and 'dislikes.' By simply using dialogue on items you want to eat, i.e., that you 'like,' which you know are wrong, unsafe, or bad for you to eat, you can end up eating that which you know is wrong, unsafe, or bad for you to eat without having a guilty conscience (until later). When you bring dialogue into an environment dealing with right and wrong behavior you can 'justify' doing that which you know is wrong, unsafe, or bad for you—without having a guilty conscience (at least for the 'moment')—making decisions that you know are wrong, unsafe, or bad for you (and other) in the end. This applies to all decisions you and others make in life. It is the father's insistence upon discussion, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth that gets in the way of dialogue, i.e., that gets in the way of your doing what you want, when you want, with the father cutting off dialogue with "Because I said so" when he deems you are not listening, i.e., you are refusing to know the truth, i.e., your are questioning, challenging, disregarding, defying, attacking his authority to establish the standards for right and wrong behavior, i.e., having the final say on the subject.

Dialogue: the pathway of 'change,' i.e., synthesis, i.e., the uniting of "self" and "the world," making "self" and "the world" one.

It is in dialogue you discover your commonality with others, i.e., your and their common "self interests," i.e., your and their "lusts," 'justifying' ("actualizing") your "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the Karl Marx in you, i.e., that which is "of, in, and for the world" only. Dialogue is "What can I get out of this for me?" (your "lust" for pleasure) and "What is going to happen to me?" (your fear of rejection). Both are key to the process of 'change.'

"Without exception, [children/students] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling them what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child/the student] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [preach established commands and rules to be obeyed as given and teach established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith], they urge the group [the children/the students] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their carnal desires ("lusts") and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the situation, i.e., their desire for group approval (affirmation)]. The group [the children/the students must] feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child/the student] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing from the child's/student's brain (thoughts) respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. … the patient [the child/the student] changes the past by reconstituting it [through role-playing]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

By making dialogue, i.e., the person's "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., his "sense experience" the basis of communication in determining right and wrong behavior, the father's/Father's authority is negated, negating the guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating) in the process. From then on, 'justifying' his "self" through dialogue, the person can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" without having a guilty conscience.

"Individuals move not from a fixity through change to a new fixity, though such a process is indeed possible [where the child accepts and obeys established commands, rules, facts, and truth, with doing right and not wrong according to established standards controlling his thoughts and actions]. But [through a] continuum from fixity to changingness, from rigid structure to flow, from stasis to process [from doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth to doing what "seems" 'right,' i.e., satisfies his carnal desires of the 'moment']." "At one end of the continuum the individual avoids close relationships, which are perceived as being dangerous [doing or being right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth being his concern]. At the other end he lives openly and freely in relation to the therapist and to others [the "educator" and "the group"], guiding his behavior on the basis of his immediate experiencing [being able to do what he wants, when he wants, in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., what he can get out of it for his "self," with group approval (affirmation)] – he has become an integrated process of changingness." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities ["lusts"] of the people change." (Marx, Critique)

Immanuel Kant wrote of a time when "lawfulness without law," i.e., the law of the flesh and eyes, i.e., "lust" would rule without restraint, i.e., without the father's/Father's authority getting in the way. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) Rejecting either-or, i.e., the father's/Father's authority outright, Marxists turn to the spectrum of compromise, i.e., to "human nature," i.e., to "the broad path," i.e., to what all men have in common—from the conservative to the liberal—"the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." Salvation, according to the Marxists can only be found in "self," i.e., in "human nature," i.e., in dialogue which is "intolerant of any influence from without," using it to 'liberate' man from the father's/Father's authority.

"Not feeling at home in the sinful world [in a world where he is told he is a sinner], Critical Criticism [the child in private (out of fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out) questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority] must set up a sinful world in its own home [where the child, dialoguing with his "self," 'justifies' his "self," i.e., 'justifies' his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' 'justifies' his resentment toward restraint, his hatred toward the father/Father, i.e., father's/Father's authority when it gets in his way, i.e., when the father/Father refuses to dialogue with him, 'justifying' (affirming) him, i.e., his carnal nature, letting him have his way]." "Critical Criticism [the child, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, hating restraint, dialoguing with his "self," 'justifying' his "self" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority] is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

"[We] must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions [those people holding onto right-wrong thinking, i.e., doing right and not wrong, insisting that others do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, sustaining the father's/Father's authority system] in joint deliberations [in the facilitated, consensus, "relationship building," "feelings," dialogue based meeting] as a vice rather than a virtue [as being "negative," i.e., the problem instead of "positive," i.e., contributing to the solution—the solution being the negation of right-wrong, judgmental thinking which inhibits or blocks "human nature," i.e., "self actualization," i.e., compromise for the sake of "relationship," i.e., humanity, i.e., "the people"]." ( Benne, Curriculum Change)

Where along this spectrum of 'change,' i.e., of "salvation," i.e., of "self" 'justification," i.e., of "self actualization" a person lies depends upon where and when he uses dialogue, i.e., "feelings" instead of discussion, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth in solving a problem, i.e., in dealing with a crisis. In this way the child's "self" image can be evaluated, based upon his either turning to discussion or to dialogue in a situation requiring compromise for the sake of "self" preservation (acceptance by "the group"). Any information he gives and tolerates that ''justifies' his and "the group's" carnal nature, i.e., "lust" is "positive." Any information that he gives that gets in the way is "negative." By simply evaluating who is "positive" and is "negative" in an environment requiring compromise, i.e., using dialogue in order to determine right and wrong behavior instead of preaching, teaching, and discussion determines the persons "mental health," i.e., what position of influence, public and private he can be trusted with. This is the purpose of the "group grade," grading all individuals upon their use of "appropriate information" or "inappropriate information" in order to solve a problem (a crisis), which requires the input and participation, i.e., "teamwork" of all who are present. "Appropriate information" 'justifies," i.e., tolerates "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," "inappropriate information" gets in the way. It is the difference between having to enter on a survey (questionnaire), most agree, agree, disagree, most disagree, etc., (opinion, engendering dialogue) or right or wrong (position, engendering discussion). In dialogue you can only see your "self" and "the world" that stimulates pleasure in you, willing to 'change' in order to "feel good." In discussion you know what you are told, holding your position when you are convinced you are right, willing to change you position when someone convinces you you are wrong, with being right and not wrong being your concern.

"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." Matthew 7:13, 14

"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Acts 4:12

"Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear." Matthew 13:13-16

Doing it, i.e., 'justifying' "self," i.e., "lust" in a group, with "the groups" affirmation (and fear of group rejection) makes "changingness" easier.

"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

Affirmation makes "changingness," i.e., Marxism stick—compromising for the sake of "human relationship" makes 'compromise' the pathway to "self preservation," i.e., "salvation." Affirmation, i.e., the praises of men is not only intoxicating, it is addictive and possessive as well. Men will die for it. It is the silent partner in the Marxist's mind 'justifying' his crimes. The dynamics of "the group" ("group dynamics"), i.e., your desire for "the groups" approval (affirming your carnal desires and hate of restraint) has a direct effect upon your thinking and therefore your behavior, i.e., actions. Your martyring of the individual in "the group" ('labeling' him or being silent as he is being 'labeled' "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' a resister of 'change,' not a "team player," a lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudice, judgmental, a racist, a Fascist, a dictator, anti-social, psychological, mental, unreasonable, irrational, impractical, etc., silencing and censoring him) in order to be affirmed by "the group," i.e., "defend" "the group," i.e., "defend" your and "the groups" "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating 'justifies' your martyring of the individual in society ['labeling' him or being silent as he is being 'labeled' ...., etc., causing him to loose his job, his reputation, and even take his own life] in order to be affirmed by "the people," i.e., "defend" "the people," i.e., "defend" your and "the peoples" "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. What takes place in "the group," i.e., the affirmation, i.e., the defense of "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" by "the group" eventually takes place in society, i.e., the affirmation, i.e., the defense of "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" by "the people." "Self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" becomes the personification of "the people." What is "good" for "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," is "good" for "the people" and what is bad for "self," i.e., the father's/Father's authority is "bad" for "the people." "Self" and "the people" become one and the same in the affirmation (consensus) process. Those who "lead" therefore can say they are doing it for "the people" when "actually" they are doing it for their "self."

"It is not individualism that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

For Karl Marx et al., the child is not "fulfilled" when he has to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, having to stand alone against "the group" when they are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, "on the contrary" he is "neurotic"—caught between doing the father's/Father's will and doing his own will instead, when his will, i.e., his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' and his father's/Father's will, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are in conflict with one another. "Building relationship with others based upon common self interests," i.e., based upon the child's carnal nature which they have in common (the basis of common-ism), i.e., finding one's identity, i.e., "self" in the other, i.e., in "the group," i.e., in society, i.e., in "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating "is the necessary framework through which freedom" from the father's/Father's authority "and individuality" to be "of and for self" and the world only "are made realities." It is important to note the difference between the father's/Father's hate and the child's hate. The father/Father, hating the child's bad behavior, does not hate the child, only chastening the child, or casting him out that he might learn to behave right. The child on the contrary, hating not only restraint but the restrainer as well (being unable to separate the two), must kill the restrainer if he is to "actualize" his "self." By make the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature," i.e., sensuousness the thesis, i.e., the foundation of knowing right from wrong, the child's hatred toward authority (and those who adhere to it)—what he has in common with all the children of the world—prevails (why Marxism, which always promises peace and harmony, always ends up in violence).

"The real nature of man is the totality of social relations." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach #6)

In other words: it is when you compromise the standards you keep your children to, in order to keep relationship with others, that you reveal your true nature. According to Karl Marx et al., society is not based upon commonly held belief, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth but upon compromise in order to "get along." Belief, i.e., the father's/Father's authority divides. Compromise, i.e., 'justifying' the child's carnal nature in us, i.e., "lust" which we all have in common unites.

"The individual is emancipated in the social group." "Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt [the guilty conscience for disobeying the father/Father] be assuaged." (Brown)

In psychology as in Marxism, it is in "the collective killing and devouring of the father," i.e., in the consensus process that the individual is 'liberated' (emancipated) from the father's/Father's authority system.

"... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

The "problem" according to Sigmund Freud was "the sons" developing a guilty conscience for having killed the father, restored his authority system, i.e., created civil society, i.e., "social morality," establishing commands, rules, facts, and truth that "the people" had to obey in order to get things done, thus inhibiting or blocking them from becoming ("actualizing") their "self." According to Marcuse, "The overthrow of the king-father is a crime, but so is his restoration.... The crime against the reality principle is redeemed by the crime against the pleasure principle: redemption thus cancels itself." In other words, due to having a guilty conscience for their deed (praxis) they restored the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., created "civil society," in the process negating their "self." Society to Freud was built upon Eros, i.e., "the pleasure principle," not law and order, i.e., "the reality principle." Somebody has to get things done, i.e., gather food, clean the house, etc.,. The question was, "How to resolve 'the problem?'' The answer was to keep Eros, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., dialogue alive in all facets of life. By making Eros, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "self interest," i.e., dialogue the 'drive' and the 'purpose' of life, the individual becomes one with society based upon what he has in common with everyone else. "Freuds individual psychology is in its very essence social psychology." (Marcuse) Therefore Eros, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., dialogue (not being told) must be a part of the individuals work environment for him to be his "self."

"The standpoint of the old materialism is civil society ["which does not comprehend sensuousness as practical activity," i.e., which does not comprehend "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" as a key ingredient to the individuals personal-social (work) life], the standpoint of the new is human society, or socialized humanity [where the "individual" and "society" become one and the same—"lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating]." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach #10)

Psychology, "behavior 'science,'" group psychotherapy, facilitation, Marxism (Transformation Marxism) are one an the same in theory and in practice. They are all based upon "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," 'liberating' "self" from the father's/Father's authority. The father's/Father's authority is negated when you focus upon "the family," neutering the father/Father in order to build "relationship" in the family on what everyone has in common, "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life."

"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

"... the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations" ... "is absolutely right.." (Maslow, Journals)

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority system]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Maslow, Farther Reaches)

"Self" 'justification' is "self-actualization," i.e., the 'liberation' of the Karl Marx in your heart.

No matter how much you try to 'justify' your "self" before men, seeking after and getting men's approval (affirmation), i.e., pleasing men you can not be or become "good." Only God is good. The only way you can become "good" in your eyes (and in the eyes of others) is to 'justify' your "self" (and their "self"), i.e., your "lust" (and their "lust"), becoming God your "self," determining right from wrong, good from evil according to your carnal nature, i.e., from your own "self," i.e., from your "sensuous needs" ("the lust of the flesh") and "sense perception" ("the lust of the eyes"), i.e., from your "sense experiences" of this life ("the pride of life"), with pleasure being "right" and restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, which engenders the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" being "wrong." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) All the "behavior scientist" can do is "help" you "actualize" your "self," i.e., 'liberate' you from the Father's authority. Bringing dialogue, i.e., "feelings," i.e., opinion, i.e., "self interest," i.e., "lust," i.e., that which is "positive" (to the flesh) into an environment deciding right and wrong behavior negates discussion, i.e., objective truth, i.e., commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., that which is "negative" (to the flesh). Anything considered as "discussion" from then on is only the result of dialogue, i.e., men's opinions, 'justifying' "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," deceiving all who participate into believing they are hearing and receiving the truth when they are actually embracing the doctrines of men, i.e., men's opinion.

Brainwashing: washing the father's/Father's authority from your thoughts, negating him in your actions.

"Change in organization [the way a person thinks] can be derived from the overlapping between play and barrier behavior. To be governed by two strong goals is equivalent to the existence of two conflicting controlling heads within the organism. This should lead to a decrease in degree of hierarchical organization. Also, a certain disorganization should result from the fact that the cognitive-motor system loses to some degree its character of a good medium because of these conflicting heads. It ceases to be in a state of near equilibrium; the forces under the control of one head have to counteract the forces of the other before they are effective." (Kurt Lewin in Child Behavior and Development Chapter XXVI Frustration and Regression)

"It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children—to insulate the children in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas." (Warren Bennis, The Temporary Society).

"To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance." "Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity [their belief, i.e., their faith in authority, be it in their parent's and/or God's authority] in the face of apparent group unanimity." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

"Group members must be able to synthesize individual 'felt' needs with common group 'felt' needs." (Bennis)

"The manner in which the prisoner came to be influenced to accept the Communist's definition of his guilt can best be described by distinguishing two broad phases—(1) a process of "unfreezing," in which the prisoner's physical resistance, social and emotional supports, self-image and sense of integrity, and basic values and personality were undermined, thereby creating a state of "readiness" to be influence; and (2) a process of "change," in which the prisoner discovered how the adoption of "the people's standpoint" and a reevaluation of himself from this perspective would provide him with a solution to the problems created by the prison pressure. Most were put into a cell containing several who were further along in reforming themselves and who saw it as their primary duty to "help" their most backward member to see the truth about himself in order that the whole cell might advance. Each such cell had a leader who was in close contact with the authorities for purposes of reporting on the cell's progress and getting advice on how to handle the Western member . . . the environment undermined the (clients) self-image." " Once this process of self of self re-evaluation began, the (client) received all kinds of help and support from the cell mates and once again was able to enter into meaningful emotional relationships with others." "The Chinese have drawn on their cultural sensitivity to the nuances of interpersonal relationships to put together some highly effective but well-known techniques of indoctrination. Their sophistication about the importance of the small group as a mediator of opinions and attitudes has led to some highly effective techniques of destroying group solidarity, as in the case of the POW's and of using groups as a mechanism of changing attitudes, as in the political prisons." (Warren G. Bennis, Edgar H. Schein, David E. Berlew, and Fred I. Steele, Interpersonal Dynamics: Essays in Readings on Human Interaction).

"In order to effect rapid change, . . . [one] must mount a vigorous attack on the family lest the traditions of present generations be preserved." "It is necessary, in other words, artificially to create an experiential chasm between parents and children—to insulate the children in order that they can more easily be indoctrinated with new ideas. If one wishes to mold children in order to achieve some future goal, one must begin to view them as superior. One must teach them not to respect their tradition-bound elders, who are tied to the past and know only what is irrelevant." (Bennis)

"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values, the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in may ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed.... many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

"Preventing someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)

"Bloom's Taxonomies," Mao's long march across America: replacing KNOWING by being told with knowing by "sense experience" only.

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

All "educators" are certified and schools accredited (including private and Christian schools, universities and trade schools) based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies" as their curriculum in the classroom. One million of "Bloom's Taxonomies" were printed for the Communist Chinese education system by the year 1971. (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation) The use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" in our classrooms has been Mao's long march across America since the 50's.

"Blooms' Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents." "Ordering" "different kinds of affective behavior," i.e., "the range of emotion(s)" "organized into value systems and philosophies of life." "It was the view of the group that educational objectives stated in the behavior form have their counterparts in the behavior of individuals, observable and describable therefore classifiable [true science is "observable and repeatable," i.e., objective, i.e., constant not "observable and describable," i.e., subject to an opinion, i.e., subject to 'change']." "Only those educational programs which can be specified in terms of intended student behaviors can be classified." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." "The student must feel free to say he disliked _____ and not have to worry about being punished for his reaction." (Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1, Cognitive Domain)

"In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx) "We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Book 1: Cognitive Domain)

"In the more traditional society a philosophy of life, a mode of conduct, is spelled out for its members at an early stage in their lives." "A major function of education in such a society is to achieve the internalization of this philosophy." "This is not to suggest that education in an open society does not attempt to develop personal and social values." "It does indeed." "But more than in traditional societies it allows the individual a greater amount of freedom in which to achieve a Weltanschauung¹." "¹Cf. Erich Fromm, 1941; T. W. Adorno et al., 1950 [two Marxist's who were members of the "Frankfurt School" who came to the states, fleeing Fascist Germany, in the early 30's—who entering our universities and "assisted" our government in making policies]." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." "… ordering and relating the different kinds of affective behavior." "… we need to provide the range of emotion from neutrality through mild to strong emotion, probably of a positive, but possibly also of a negative, kind." "… organized into value systems and philosophies of life …" "...many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized."
(Book 1: Cognitive Domain and Book 2: Affective Domain)

"My attitudes toward God, home and family are private concerns." "The public-private status of cognitive vs. affective behaviors is deeply rooted in the Judeo-Christian religion and is a value highly cherished in the democratic traditions of the Western world." "… the Taxonomy will provide a bridge ... between teachers and evaluators, ... psychologists, ... behavioral scientists." "'Folklure' …can be replaces by ... affective behaviors." (Book 2: Affective Domain)

In other words the parent's authority, restraining the child's carnal nature can be bypassed (circumvented) and replaced with the child's carnal desires, i.e., "feelings" and anyone manipulating them in the classroom, in order to make 'change' possible, i.e., in order to negate the father's/Father's authority in society. This was accomplished by "encouraging" students "to talk freely ... by indicating, for example, that critical remarks about parents were perfectly in place, thus reducing defenses as well as feelings of guilt and anxiety." (Adorno)

"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)

"A change in the curriculum is a change in the people concerned—in teachers, in students, in parents ....." "Curriculum change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." "... people involved who were loyal to the older pattern must be helped to transfer their allegiance to the new." "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs [paradigm] of an individual or a group." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

"Any intervention between parent and child tend to produce familial democracy regardless of its intent. The consequences of family democratization take a long time to make themselves felt—but it would be difficult to reverse the process once begun. … once the parent can in any way imagine his own orientation to be a possible liability to the child in the world approaching." "Once uncertainty is created in the parent how best to prepare the child for the future, the authoritarian family is moribund, regardless of whatever countermeasures may be taken." "The state, by its very interference in the life of its citizens, must necessarily undermine a parental authority which it attempts to restore." "Any non-family-based collectivity that intervenes between parent and child and attempts to regulate and modify the parent-child relationship will have a democratizing impact on that relationship. For however much the state or community may wish to inculcate obedience and submission in the child, its intervention betrays a lack of confidence in the only objects from whom a small child can learn authoritarian submission, an overweening interest in the future development of the child-- in other words, a child centered orientation." (Bennis)

"We are not entirely sure that opening our 'box' is necessarily a good thing; we are certain that it is not likely to be a source of peace and harmony among the members of a school staff." (Book 2: Affective Domain)

Placing a discussion, i.e., a commands, rules, facts, and truth—"barrier behavior"—based child in an environment that is determining right and wrong behavior through dialogue, i.e., through "feelings," i.e., through opinion, i.e., through "self interest," i.e., through carnal desires, i.e., through the "affective domain," i.e., through "lust"—"play behavior"—creates in the child a condition known as cognitive dissonance where the child is caught between his "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., his "self interest," i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment' and the commands, rules, facts, and truth that he has been taught (told), i.e., his belief, forcing him to choose between the two in an environment that is 'justifying' his "feelings," i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lusts," i.e., his "play behavior" and is also hostel toward discussion, i.e., his "barrier behavior" that gets in the way of their carnal desires, thus forcing on the child fear, i.e., fear of rejection by the other children if he insist upon discussion, i.e., commands, rules, facts, and truth that interfere with their "feelings," i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "play behavior." In choosing "relationship" with, i.e., affirmation by "the group" he has to negate his belief, making his "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., his "play behavior," i.e., dialogue from then on the means by which he determines right and wrong behavior.

The dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., Marxism in the classroom 'liberates' the students from their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system.

The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate.

Your heart: the Karl Marx in you.

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart establishes the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your "self interest" of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Your heart is "desperately wicked" in that it hates restraint, i.e., hates the father's/Father's authority for "getting in the way," i.e. for preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. You can not see your hate of restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "lust," i.e., your "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug your "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., your "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward the father/Father (and those who have faith in and obey him/Him), who is (are) preventing or trying to prevent you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., when you are "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—as being "wicked," making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain pleasure, keep pleasure, or get pleasure back, which includes the praises (affirmation, i.e., 'justification') of men, with you removing or attempting to remove anyone who is getting in the way. In dialogue, in your opinion, and in the consensus process you are god, i.e., a god amongst gods, i.e., a Karl Marx amongst Karl Marxs', 'justifying' your "self," i.e., the Karl Marx in you, doing your, i.e., Karl Marx's will instead of the Father's, dying in your sins.

"And through covetousness [your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts"] shall they with feigned words [plastic words, Gr., i.e., doublespeak, i.e., saying one thing while meaning another, i.e., giving you what you want to hear in order to gain their trust thereby being able to move you down their pathway] make merchandise of you [turn you into "human resource" to be used for their own pleasure and gain—so you can be bought and sold in the market place of men's carnal desires]." 2 Peter 2:3

Through dialogue, 'discovering' your "self interest," i.e., what you "covet," the facilitator of 'change,' as a charlatan, pedophile, pimp is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you, i.e., turn you into "human resource"—as one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, Pavlov's dog (stimulus-response)—so him can use you for his own pleasure and gain.

"We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." "If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood."
'...we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"Re-education must be clever enough in manipulating the subjects to have them think that they are running the show." "The objective sought will not be reached so long as the new set of values is not experienced by the individual as something freely chosen." "An outright enforcement of the new set of values and beliefs is simply the introduction of a new god who has to fight with the old god, now regarded as a devil." (Principles of Re-education Kurt Lewin and Paul Grabbe "Conduct, Knowledge, and Acceptance of New Values"; The Journal of Social Issues)

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

The road to "Utopia," i.e., to "worldly peace and socialist harmony," i.e., to where you can "lust" without having a guilty conscience, with men's affirmation ('justification') is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous. It is a bloody path that begins with pleasure, i.e., "lust " as its 'drive' making the negation of the father's/Father's authority its 'purpose'—in order (as in "new" world order) for man, 'justifying' his "self" before one another, to do abominable things without having a guilty conscience. What begins with "We care about you" ends with "Am I my brother's keeper."

"Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished." Proverbs 16:5

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making [the father's/Father's authority system], our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

The greatest fear the Marxist has is "the people" coming to KNOW the truth, judging, condemning, and rejecting him, i.e., preventing him from having access to their money, i.e., living off of them. There is no KNOWING in dialogue, only opinion. By bringing those in authority into dialogue, making their position just another opinion amongst opinions, those in authority negate their authority.

"For to accept that solution [where all citizens, including parents, must participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., stop telling one another they are wrong—in order to build relationship with one another (based upon "feelings," i.e., upon everyone's carnal desires, i.e., upon everyone's "self interest" of the 'moment')], even in theory, would be tantamount to observing society from a class standpoint [from the child's perspective, i.e., from the child's carnal nature] other than that of the bourgeoisie [from the parent's authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system]. And no class can do that-unless it is willing to abdicate its power freely [chose relationship with those who are wrong instead of holding them accountable for doing wrong—correcting, reproving, chastening them when they do wrong, casting them out when they reject, i.e., question, challenge, deny, disregard, attack right-wrong thinking, i.e., the father's/Father's authority]." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

How you know you are in a Marxist environment.

The next time you find your "self" in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., in a facilitated, "Be 'positive,' not 'negative,'" i.e., Marxist meeting or classroom, know this: there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., in a facilitated, "Be 'positive,' not 'negative,'" meeting or classroom, there is only "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the Karl Marx in you and in everyone else being 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority.

The solution to overcoming Marxism, i.e., the Karl Marx in you.

"Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee." Psalms 119:11

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." "And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:15, 17

Your heart, i.e., "What can I get out of this situation/person for me?" "What is going to happen to me if they reject me?" sides with dialogue, making you God, deciding right and wrong behavior according to your carnal nature, i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your "felt needs." "Thy word have I hid in mine heart," sides with discussion, " that [you] might not sin against [God]," with God deciding right and wrong behavior for you instead, i.e., "directing your steps."

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Matthew 16:24-27

The solution (only solution) to Marxism, i.e., to the Karl Marx in your heart is 1) to deny your "self," i.e., the Karl Marx in you, i.e., your "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' i.e., to humble, deny, die to your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's will, 2) to pick up your cross, i.e., to accept and endure men's, i.e., "the group's," i.e., "the people's" and the facilitator of 'change's, i.e., Karl Marx's rejecting you for not affirming ('justifying') their/his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' i.e., to endure to the end, and 3) to follow the Lord Christ Jesus, doing the Father's will.

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6

"Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven. Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that " Matthew 10:32-39

"As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." Revelation 3:19-21

In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., in the facilitated meeting or classroom there is no "fear of God before your eyes," there is only your fear of what "the group" will do to you if you turn against it, i.e., if you expose (condemn) it for its sins. At that 'moment' you have to decide where you want to spend eternity.

"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Matthew 10:28

"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13

"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10

"That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

By making the approval of men, i.e., "building relationships based upon common self interests" the agenda of life you guarantee that the fear of rejection by men controls your life. Some day you will take your last breath and either pay for your sins with eternal death or, knowing his Son, who in obedience to His Heavenly Father covered your sins with his shed blood on the cross, inherit eternal life. Christ Jesus came to 'redeem' you from your sins, 'reconciling' you to the Father. Karl Marx came to 'redeem' you from the Father, 'reconciling' you to your sins. Those are the only two choices you have in this life—regarding where you will spend eternity. They are not given to you by Karl Marx (you are born with Karl Marx in our heart, i.e., born into sin, being cast into the lake of fire that is never quenched along with him if you refuse to repent), but by God, 'redeeming' you from His judgment upon the Karl Marx in your heart, i.e., for your sins, 'reconciling' you to himself instead, that you might partake in His Holiness throughout eternity. You could say, either you pay for hanging around with Karl Marx or the Lord pays for you, 'redeeming' you from God's judgment upon you for your sins, i.e., for 'justifying' your deceitful and wicked heart, i.e., the Karl Marx in you.

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8, 9

"So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Romans 10:17

"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." "But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." Hebrews 11:1, 6

"The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil." John 7:7

"And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved." Mathew 10:22

The Karl Marx in your heart can only be overcome by faith in Jesus Christ. All other paths have Karl Marx on them. It is not how far down the pathway you have traveled, i.e., "I am not as bad as him," It is that you are on it. One step in it (as in a pig pen) and you stink, 'justifying' your "self," blaming someone else or your surroundings for your sins. When you 'justify' your "self," i.e., your sins, you are 'justifying' the Karl Marx in you, letting him decide where you will spend eternity. If you do not take care of the Karl Marx in your heart, the Karl Marx in your heart will "take care" of you. If you do not take care of the Karl Marx in your child's heart, the Karl Marx in your child's heart will "take care" of you, your grandchildren, etc.,.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020